|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Mar 8, 2023 21:11:40 GMT -5
Activate Meier Hall to IR Sign Justin Schultz
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Mar 26, 2023 21:55:09 GMT -5
Svech to IR, activate Blackwood
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Sept 4, 2023 9:37:12 GMT -5
Anaheim releases Josh Brook from Tulsa
Assign Helge Grans (21/0)* to Tulsa from San Diego
Assign Connor Ingram (26/30)** to San Diego
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Oct 9, 2023 21:23:41 GMT -5
Couture to IR
Call up Evan Bouchard to Anaheim
Move Thomas Bordeleau (21/16)* to San Diego
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Oct 10, 2023 16:35:42 GMT -5
Ekblad to IR, sign Cam Fowler
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Oct 18, 2023 21:53:46 GMT -5
Send Bode Wilde (23/0)* to Tulsa
Claim Sam Montembeault off waivers, Send Matt Tomkins (28/0)** to San Diego
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Nov 18, 2023 21:50:55 GMT -5
Activate Ekblad from IR Release Couture Lehkonen to IR Dubois to IR Sign Tolvanen
|
|
|
Post by Daniel - Canucks on Nov 18, 2023 22:08:43 GMT -5
Activate Ekblad from IR Release Couture Lehkonen to IR Dubois to IR Sign Tolvanen Eeli Tolvanen has been lost to Suspended Waivers as he has played in 201 NHL games.
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Nov 18, 2023 22:30:19 GMT -5
Activate Dubois, Meier to IR
|
|
|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Nov 19, 2023 10:07:08 GMT -5
Activate Ekblad from IR Release Couture Lehkonen to IR Dubois to IR Sign Tolvanen Eeli Tolvanen has been lost to Suspended Waivers as he has played in 201 NHL games. Sad but true. It really sucks when this happens. What would an appropriate compensation option be during the summer for the offending team to retain the rights of any player in violation? 3rd Round Waiver? 2nd around Entry? Nothing? We don’t want to promote roster mismanagement, but this is an idea I’ve been thinking about.
|
|
|
Post by Colin - Avalanche on Nov 19, 2023 10:27:41 GMT -5
Eeli Tolvanen has been lost to Suspended Waivers as he has played in 201 NHL games. Sad but true. It really sucks when this happens. What would an appropriate compensation option be during the summer for the offending team to retain the rights of any player in violation? 3rd Round Waiver? 2nd around Entry? Nothing? We don’t want to promote roster mismanagement, but this is an idea I’ve been thinking about. I guess you could have a 3rd waiver. Has to be high enough to make you think about it. The only thing is someone could purposely do it. Say last year with Hughes or Stutzle, I let either go to suspended waivers. Especially Stutzle because he hit 200 games during playoffs. I Get to keep an extra player on my roster, and keeping him only costs a 3rd. Unless he costs a keeper slot too, or its value based compensation on pts scored that year. Like over 70 pts, 1st waiver, etc. Maybe extreme example but it invites more shenanigans haha
|
|
|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Nov 19, 2023 22:24:07 GMT -5
Sad but true. It really sucks when this happens. What would an appropriate compensation option be during the summer for the offending team to retain the rights of any player in violation? 3rd Round Waiver? 2nd around Entry? Nothing? We don’t want to promote roster mismanagement, but this is an idea I’ve been thinking about. I guess you could have a 3rd waiver. Has to be high enough to make you think about it. The only thing is someone could purposely do it. Say last year with Hughes or Stutzle, I let either go to suspended waivers. Especially Stutzle because he hit 200 games during playoffs. I Get to keep an extra player on my roster, and keeping him only costs a 3rd. Unless he costs a keeper slot too, or its value based compensation on pts scored that year. Like over 70 pts, 1st waiver, etc. Maybe extreme example but it invites more shenanigans haha There will always be shenanigans abound. But just to be clear, the player would not remain on the roster. The player would be placed on suspended waivers at which point the team in violation would decide whether or not to pay the pick to retain the rights to the player during the summer before other teams could sign/draft the player in question.
|
|
|
Post by Colin - Avalanche on Nov 19, 2023 23:45:01 GMT -5
I guess you could have a 3rd waiver. Has to be high enough to make you think about it. The only thing is someone could purposely do it. Say last year with Hughes or Stutzle, I let either go to suspended waivers. Especially Stutzle because he hit 200 games during playoffs. I Get to keep an extra player on my roster, and keeping him only costs a 3rd. Unless he costs a keeper slot too, or its value based compensation on pts scored that year. Like over 70 pts, 1st waiver, etc. Maybe extreme example but it invites more shenanigans haha There will always be shenanigans abound. But just to be clear, the player would not remain on the roster. The player would be placed on suspended waivers at which point the team in violation would decide whether or not to pay the pick to retain the rights to the player during the summer before other teams could sign/draft the player in question. Right, I get that. He wouldn't be useable. But, if say he was a for sure keeper like Hughes. I submit my 10 keepers (not including the player in question). Then pay the 3rd to retain the rights? Or would I have to pay the 3rd to keep his rights, then spend a keeper on top of that?
|
|
|
Post by Nos - Sharks on Nov 20, 2023 2:48:37 GMT -5
Excellent points by Colin, I would assume it would have to be the pick spent plus the Keeper Slot, otherwise it would be like getting an extra Keeper Slot for a 3rd Waiver. It's really not about shenanigans, it's...what is this rule and what can be done with it? Another thing to consider is the extra roster spot you'd get by holding a player hostage until the summer. It's a slippery slope and I honestly don't see the problem with the rules as is, if you're negligent you pay the price and hopefully learn a lesson and improve for the future.
|
|
|
Post by Colin - Avalanche on Nov 20, 2023 8:08:46 GMT -5
Excellent points by Colin, I would assume it would have to be the pick spent plus the Keeper Slot, otherwise it would be like getting an extra Keeper Slot for a 3rd Waiver. It's really not about shenanigans, it's...what is this rule and what can be done with it? Another thing to consider is the extra roster spot you'd get by holding a player hostage until the summer. It's a slippery slope and I honestly don't see the problem with the rules as is, if you're negligent you pay the price and hopefully learn a lesson and improve for the future. I agree here, I don't think we need to change it. If it's draft pick plus keeper slot then ok, you're not gaining advantage. But I'm fine as is. Just gets put in the draft next year... Also I thought the price for negligence was a 1st round draft pick accoriding to Garry?? Lol go Sens Go!
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Dec 4, 2023 8:20:55 GMT -5
Lehkonen and Hamilton to IR Activate Ekblad Release Couture, Sign Mrazek
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Dec 5, 2023 20:37:18 GMT -5
Sign Rodrigues, release Mrazek
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Dec 17, 2023 21:37:43 GMT -5
Sign Rodrigues, release Mrazek Release Lehkonen Svechnikov to IR Sign Couture
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Jan 8, 2024 14:04:29 GMT -5
Activate Svechnikov, Werenski to IR
|
|
|
Post by Mitch - Ducks on Jan 21, 2024 16:17:09 GMT -5
Release Matt Tomkins from San Diego Sign Egor Zamula (23/64)* to San Diego
|
|