Andrew
Second Liner
25%
Posts: 320
|
Post by Andrew on Feb 28, 2007 18:40:14 GMT -5
What does the rest of the leauge think about this??? is anyone here? I think... I'm sleepy You can ask the league what they think, but it doesn't mean anything. You've both presented your sides so we can make our own conclusions based on those, but discussing who we think is right/wrong will just stir up a lot of unneeded shit and under the circumstances I don't think there's anything useful that can be said or done. I don't want to get involved with anything really, but Phil, could you clarify what you mean here when you say and then at the end of the same post you add Just seems like a bit of a contradiction unless I'm misreading something.
|
|
|
Post by Chris - Capitals on Feb 28, 2007 18:54:33 GMT -5
What does the rest of the leauge think about this??? is anyone here? I think... I'm sleepy You can ask the league what they think, but it doesn't mean anything. You've both presented your sides so we can make our own conclusions based on those, but discussing who we think is right/wrong will just stir up a lot of unneeded shit and under the circumstances I don't think there's anything useful that can be said or done. I don't want to get involved with anything really, but Phil, could you clarify what you mean here when you say and then at the end of the same post you add Just seems like a bit of a contradiction unless I'm misreading something. I can understand that..... As for this....if thats how everyone else feels can this just be closed? all thats happening is Phil going off and questioning my character and this and that and its just becoming a pissin contest of wits
|
|
|
Post by Phil - Blue Jackets on Feb 28, 2007 19:33:35 GMT -5
What does the rest of the leauge think about this??? is anyone here? I think... I'm sleepy You can ask the league what they think, but it doesn't mean anything. You've both presented your sides so we can make our own conclusions based on those, but discussing who we think is right/wrong will just stir up a lot of unneeded shit and under the circumstances I don't think there's anything useful that can be said or done. I don't want to get involved with anything really, but Phil, could you clarify what you mean here when you say and then at the end of the same post you add Just seems like a bit of a contradiction unless I'm misreading something. Yes, I can clarify. I don't have a problem with the league exercising its right to veto a trade. However, the way the veto was handled and finally carried out was nothing but shitty and dumb right down to the last vote cast by one of the originals involved in the trade. That's what I meant; no problem with a veto, big problem with how it was handled. I don't think anyone can disagree with that.
|
|
|
Post by Chris - Capitals on Feb 28, 2007 19:46:48 GMT -5
just wondering but what makes you so sure that my vote sent it to 8???
not saying it was or wasnt im just asking
|
|
|
Post by Phil - Blue Jackets on Feb 28, 2007 20:10:03 GMT -5
just wondering but what makes you so sure that my vote sent it to 8??? not saying it was or wasnt im just asking You're right. I can't be completely sure short of looking over Derrick's shoulder while he looks at who has voted in that poll. That statement is dependant on Derrick telling me the truth. Either it happened that way or he's a liar. Given the fact I've known him for years, I believe him. So, if you want to deny it, that is your perogative. I'll check it out.
|
|
|
Post by Chris - Capitals on Feb 28, 2007 20:12:34 GMT -5
Yo man im not callin your nor Derrick a liar im just askin how you can be sure relax
and as i said before i thought the trade was already vetoed about 3 weeks ago im pretty sure i read somwhere that the owners involved didnt get a vote that it took 7 to veto
|
|
|
Post by Phil - Blue Jackets on Feb 28, 2007 20:20:14 GMT -5
Yo man im not callin your nor Derrick a liar im just askin how you can be sure relax and as i said before i thought the trade was already vetoed about 3 weeks ago im pretty sure i read somwhere that the owners involved didnt get a vote that it took 7 to veto I'm relaxed. I was just answering your question. Where did you read that? The rulebook? A poll thread that was conducted to change a rule? That has never been and still isn't the rule. I yelled at Derrick to vote for 2-3 weeks, but he fucked around and stalled on it. That is the bullshit I hold him responsible for.
|
|
|
Post by Chris - Capitals on Feb 28, 2007 20:40:48 GMT -5
i actually read it in a thread you started about the "new rule book".....thats where I was getting my info from that was right after I moved so I missed the convos and everything on it just read it real quick after I got the internet back. If that in fact isnt the way it went down thats my bad misscommunication on my part I did think the trade was vetoed man....im not in the bus of tryin to dick people around
and from what ive read Derrick was gonna veto it....in a few post ive read it says....deff veto worthy
|
|