|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Oct 26, 2010 14:44:09 GMT -5
Commissioner Rankings
1. Ottawa Back to back NAFHL Championships. 2. Detroit More injured or suspended roster players (8) than goalie wins (7), which is second most in the league. 3. Minnesota 12 category fantasy producer. NAFHL's Corey Perry. 4. San Jose After slow start, uncharted territory for former NAFHL champ. Iginla, Lecavalier, Pronger worries? 5. Carolina Here I am, rock you like a Hurricane. 4 SHP, 9 GWG in first 2 weeks. 6/7. Boston Consistently underrated. This year is no different. Khabibulin to jail? 7/6/8. Calgary Doughty to IR. Brent Johnson... 8/7. Anaheim Who needs defense or goal tending anyway? 9. Washington Early season injuries to Varlamov, Green. Gagne/Clarkson combined = 0 PTS, -16 10. Toronto Stamkos on pace for 82 goals. Thomas on pace for 60 W, 0.75, .978, 15 SHO *crickets* 11. Atlanta Returning Markov should provide boost. 12. Colorado This team goes where its goal tending takes it.
Power Rankings
1. Boston (115) 2. Minnesota (114) 3. Calgary (106) 4. Carolina (106) 5. Toronto (102) 6. Ottawa (100) 7. Anaheim (91) 8. Atlanta (91) 9. San Jose (91) 10. Washington (78) 11. Detroit (77) 12. Colorado (75)
Standings
1. Carolina 2. Toronto 3. Boston 4. Ottawa 5. Minnesota 6. Anaheim 7. Calgary 8. San Jose 9. Atlanta 10. Detroit 11. Washington 12. Colorado
IDLE COULD RISE COULD FALL
|
|
|
Post by Robyn - Flames on Nov 1, 2010 12:15:59 GMT -5
Detroit is too high at #2 and Toronto will finish higher than 10th. How do you determine your commissioner rankings? Who would win head-to-head or a prediction of final league standings?
Thanks for your post.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Nov 1, 2010 18:24:34 GMT -5
Detroit is too high at #2 and Toronto will finish higher than 10th. How do you determine your commissioner rankings? Who would win head-to-head or a prediction of final league standings? Thanks for your post. Commissioner Rankings are calculated by current production vs. anticipated production, taking into account hot starts, cold streaks, injuries, etc. They are subjective, and are meant to predict the likelihood of a given team winning the NAFHL championship, assuming no injuries, and players playing to potential. This sort of system can not predict down years, fluke years, or any other anomaly in the values of players, which is why I am always hesitant to drastically move teams up or down in rankings without some sort of consistency in production or lack thereof. For example, Toronto's goalies = 10-0-1, 1.18, .959, 3 SHO totaling 20 of its 47 points in the standings. Which translates roughly to a projected pace of 149-0-15, 1.18, .959, 45 SHO on the season (assuming said goalies started every game). This level of production is without a doubt, unsustainable, and would mean that NHL Boston and San Jose would have to go undefeated. The fact of the matter is, these numbers are going to worsen, AT LEAST by 100%, probably more. Which, if calculated NOW, would place Toronto right around the 34 point mark, good enough to make the consolation bracket, and one loss away from 10th place. At the beginning of the year, Toronto didn't even have a starting goaltender, much less the best goalie stats (by far) in the league. Oh the irony. I am really pulling for them but nevertheless, one injury, a few bad games, and this is a sinking ship.
|
|