|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Jul 9, 2013 13:27:27 GMT -5
I don't think this one needs much of an explanation.
Please vote now.
|
|
|
Post by Nos - Sharks on Jul 9, 2013 19:50:42 GMT -5
Being absent during the Entry Draft is unacceptable, huge hit to the Toronto franchise. Unless Scott can give a really good excuse for his absence I'm voting for removal. Sorry Scott.
|
|
|
Post by Nos - Sharks on Jul 11, 2013 0:30:37 GMT -5
No response? Peace.
|
|
|
Post by Markus - Hurricanes on Jul 11, 2013 2:56:07 GMT -5
Voted yes. Missing/being late on all of your picks in the entry draft simply isn't acceptable.
|
|
|
Post by Tyler - Jets on Jul 11, 2013 15:51:36 GMT -5
I will vote no. Only because I know Scott personally and understand kind of what's been happening. He is a good GM and really has passion for fantasy hockey. That being said I think he should defend himself to the rest of the GM's and prove he truly wants to be part of this league. My one vote probably won't change the out come anyway. Missing the draft is huge and understand the league position is most likely going to be for removal.
|
|
|
Post by Mark - Bruins on Jul 15, 2013 0:02:38 GMT -5
After missing most of the entry draft & having a week of no response to this thread, I have to assume Scott's not interested in his team anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Jul 19, 2013 18:18:23 GMT -5
I have spoken with Scott privately and he has explained to me what has been going on. He has in the past been a dedicated GM in this league, and I believe he will be a dedicated GM in this league moving forward. As a result, Scott will be staying with us.
This thread and its results will stand as a probationary caution. Should future issues arise, Scott will be immediately removed from the league.
|
|
Hawks
Second Liner
25%
Posts: 372
|
Post by Hawks on Jul 23, 2013 9:12:00 GMT -5
Glad to see he'll be sticking around. I voted for removal based on missing the draft, but also because Scott never responded to the removal thread.
|
|