|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Nov 27, 2013 5:49:15 GMT -5
Last Yahoo Activity: Wed Nov 13 7:45am EST Last Forum Activity: Sep 6, 2013 at 10:37am
Subsequent Violations:
10/5/13 - League Violation - Did note vote in the Tim Thomas Ownership Poll
Roster Violation - Did not set lineup 10/10/13
Roster Violation - Allowed Filip Forsberg's eligibility to expire for farm-farm team 10/21/13
Roster Violations - Did not set line-up 11/17 - 11/26, 11/16, 11/15, 11/14, 11/13, 11/12, 11/10, 11/9, 11/7, 11/5, 11/3, 10/30, 10/29, 10/27, 10/24, 10/22.
|
|
|
Post by Tyler - Jets on Nov 27, 2013 8:10:16 GMT -5
I vote remove he doesn't seem as invested as in the past. There may be a good explanation but you have to put in the effort to be competitive in this league.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Nov 30, 2013 3:12:00 GMT -5
Bump
|
|
|
Post by Markus - Hurricanes on Nov 30, 2013 11:25:01 GMT -5
If my memory serves me right I've never received a reply to a trade offer in under 2 weeks from him, if he bothered to reply at all. Avalanche franchise deserves better.
|
|
|
Post by Tyler - Jets on Dec 5, 2013 23:33:00 GMT -5
What's going on here??
|
|
|
Post by Tyler - Jets on Dec 5, 2013 23:35:28 GMT -5
We should get things moving and a GM in place.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Dec 6, 2013 9:51:06 GMT -5
We are waiting for the poll to expire on December 11th.
|
|
|
Post by Tyler - Jets on Dec 6, 2013 17:43:25 GMT -5
If all the votes are in is it not closed. If you haven't voted get your ass in gear and participate. This is a big fantasy league and we need GM's to be involved. Competition will increase if all GM's put in a little more time.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick - Senators on Dec 7, 2013 7:55:31 GMT -5
If all the votes are in is it not closed. If you haven't voted get your ass in gear and participate. This is a big fantasy league and we need GM's to be involved. Competition will increase if all GM's put in a little more time. All the votes are in from all the active Gm's, but we are obviously still waiting on Ryan - Avalanche. And while it is extremely unlikely that he is going to show up, I want to make sure that the processes that are detailed in the new rulebook are followed to prevent future discrepancy. So we will wait.
|
|
|
Post by Glenn - Wild on Dec 7, 2013 9:55:37 GMT -5
L) The only exception to the rules stated above would be in the event of an inactive manager(s), in which case an 8/11 vote must be reached.
This is written in the rule book. Isn't that exactly what's going on here. Isn't this the exception. I don't know if that means we don't have to wait the 2 weeks or not. We may still have to. Technically his vote doesn't matter now anyways. We already have 11 of 11 votes. I don't mind waiting at all I was just being curious.
|
|